Entitlement to fulfilling and adequate nutritional nourishment, shelter, clothing and all the other things that make a life worth living is thought to be the domain of "involuntarily impoverished" men, (povcels). But is this a "man thing"?

Do you see the logic of where this is going?

You know, I've just overlooked something that I so should have picked out sooner: All of the stick-figures that are given negative and devaluing societal attributes all happen to be Black? Is there some kind of racial bias/prejudice going on here?

Something often overlooked is the way in which a person's demographic ethnic identity can be used as a double-edged sword in terms of abject fetishisation and objectification, or even as the basis for outright rejection?

Is it possible that you could have accidentally been playing into racial / ethnic stereotyping here?